Key Takeaways

  • Upfront Design for Manufacturability (DFM) and Mold Flow reviews prevent defects and delays. They identify manufacturability issues, fill problems, stress concentrations, and warpage risks before tooling, reducing redesign cycles and launch risk.
  • Simulation-driven optimization lowers cost and material usage. DFM and Mold Flow help simplify geometry, improve gate and runner design, enhance cooling efficiency, and reduce resin content, which lowers tooling, scrap, and production costs.
  • Combined analysis improves overall part quality and production efficiency. Using both tools leads to better fill balance, more consistent parts, smoother molding cycles, and fewer quality issues during full-scale production.

Can a Design for Manufacturability (DFM) review and Mold Flow simulation improve your injection molded part launch?

Absolutely! Design for Manufacturability (DFM) and Mold Flow simulations are two key tools in the design and development of injection molds. Their use before starting the mold build process can provide significant advantages in terms of time, cost, quality, and efficiency. Let’s break it down:

  1. Time Savings:
    • DFM Analysis: By analyzing the design early, potential manufacturing issues can be identified before tooling is created. This means fewer design iterations and quicker feedback from the manufacturing team.
    • Mold Flow Simulation: With Mold Flow, you can predict how the molten material will flow through the mold. This helps identify potential issues, such as air traps, weld lines, or areas of insufficient material fill, so they can be corrected early in the design phase. It saves time by reducing the likelihood of delays during actual mold trials.
  1. Cost Savings:
    • DFM: A design that’s optimized for manufacturability typically requires fewer modifications during production, lowering the cost of tooling, materials, and labor. It also reduces the chance of expensive rework after the mold is built and tested.
    • Mold Flow: Mold flow analysis helps prevent costly mistakes like improper gate placement, inadequate cooling, or the wrong material selection that could affect the mold’s performance and longevity. By simulating various injection parameters and adjusting the design accordingly, the mold build is less likely to need costly revisions.
  1. Improved Efficiency:
    • DFM: Ensuring that the design is optimized for manufacturing means that production can proceed smoothly without the need for constant troubleshooting. This leads to faster cycle times and improved throughput during actual manufacturing.
    • Mold Flow: Identifying cooling inefficiencies, areas prone to uneven material distribution, or regions where stress might concentrate helps streamline the molding process. The result is a mold that operates more efficiently during production, which ultimately reduces waste and optimizes material use.
  1. Reduction in Resin Content:
    • DFM: Making the design more manufacturable often includes making sure the geometry is as simple and material-efficient as possible, leading to better use of resources.  Parts can be “cored out” to remove unnecessarily thick cross-sections.
    • Mold Flow: You can analyze the material flow and identify areas where resin might be used inefficiently. For example, adjusting gate sizes or optimizing the design for uniform fill can reduce the overall resin requirement. This leads to material cost savings and a more sustainable design, as less scrap and waste are generated.
  1. Improved Product Quality:
    • DFM: A design that is optimized for manufacturability is more likely to result in parts that meet the required specifications, are less prone to defects, and are produced at a higher consistency.
    • Mold Flow: Mold flow analysis identifies potential problems with the molding process before production starts, like flow imbalances, cooling issues, or high-stress areas. This ensures better part quality by addressing these problems in the design phase.
  1. Early Detection of Design Issues:
  • DFM & Mold Flow: Together, these tools provide a comprehensive approach to detect and correct design issues such as:
    • Underfills: Areas where the mold doesn’t fill completely or evenly.
    • Warpage: Parts that may deform after cooling due to uneven material flow or cooling rates.
    • Brittleness: Stress points in the design that may lead to premature failure.
    • Gates and Runner Design: Optimal gate placement and runner size are critical for controlling the flow and avoiding defects.

By using these tools before beginning the mold build, you ensure that you’re addressing potential problems early, which can save significant time and money. The investment in using DFM and Mold Flow simulations upfront can pay off with a smoother manufacturing process and better-quality products.  At Vital Plastics, we provide these analytic tools with EVERY tool we launch to ensure our customers’ success. 

Want to learn more? Let us know how we can support your next project.

Next, check out…

Viital Plastics injection molding. plastic injection molding manufacturer
REAL-TIME QUALITY MONITORING

Learn how IQMS powers operational excellence at Vital Plastics.

plastic injection molds
RJG AT VITAL

Vital Plastics utilizes RJG’s scientific molding practices to ensure optimized performance from the start. 

Vital Plastics Tooling Maintenance
RUNNER SYSTEMS

Read our expert engineering insights to see which runner system may be right for your project.